

Our Research Activities

2. Research on Female Non Normative Sexualities in Africa and Asia supported by Riek Stientra Foundation (on going)
The objectives are :
Over the past decades both the women’s human/sexual rights discourse has developed and the struggles for their rights by members of same-sex or transgender/transsexual communities have gained wide attention. Scholarship on these issues is also growing, though in many instances it is still marginalized. Attention to issues related to female-bodied persons has lagged behind. The installation of the Chair on Gender and Women’s Same-Sex Relations Crossculturally at the University of Amsterdam is the first of its kind globally.
TRANS/SIGN interrogates the construction of sexual normalcy or heteronormative orthodoxy and promotes advocacy to increase the agency of those who oppose compulsory and normative heterosexuality. Heteronormativity works in a double-edged way. It disciplines those inside and it marginalizes and stigmatizes those outside of its borders. Non-heteronormative persons see themselves in relation to the heteronormative society that excludes them but rarely do they analyse the commonalities in the strategies by which they are 'othered', both from a crosscultual perspective and from the perspective of other sexually marginalized people. TRANS/SIGN research topics include the ways their identities and subjectivities are constructed, their social, economic, sexual and religious agency and the embodiment of that agency, as well as the role of the state, religion and NGO’s. The power of ‘normalcy’, or heteronomative orthodoxy, and the symbolic violence this entails for these marginalized persons need to be analytically deconstructed in order for effective actions to be built. Ultimately the research done within TRANS/SIGN will contribute to the struggle for sexual rights not only for the marginalized groups, but also for those living within the norm. Relatedly, the possibilities of social and sexual agency will be explored, particularly as it concerns the embodiment of resistance in so far as this exceeds the bounds of the habitus in which heteronormativity is lived and the socio-cultural space in which resistance is taking shape.